| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
summoner_sheena
Joined: 16 Apr 2005 Posts: 9999 Location: Back to wherever Morgan hired me to be
|
Posted: Sat Jan 12, 2008 12:20 pm Post subject: Topic revival |
|
|
(Okay I admit I shouldn't be making this when I've revived a few topics as a joke before. Those are in the past. One of which was a week or so ago. That's still the past. Go away.)
Recently, I've been seeing a lot of 2-3 month old topics being revived, mostly in the Tales sections. For at least a page everyone posts boring, generic "Y U REVIVE THIS" messages. It's....annoying, and it happens every week at least once. Maybe twice. Each time I ask myself "...What is the big deal, it's just 2-3 months old <_>" There's no doubt that most of the Tales sections get less attention than the infamous terrible off topic ones. Isn't it better to just search back a few pages and see if your topic has been done rather than make a brand new one? If Generic Newbie makes a topic that has been done before 3 weeks ago, he gets yelled at by Veteran Tales Sectioner and linked to the thread. But if Generic Newbie revives a topic 5 weeks ago, Veteran Tales Sectioner yells at them and links a mod to it.
Is this a big deal? No, not really. I speak only for myself and my happiness because I am a horrible hivemind offtopicer; can we please decide on a cut off date for topic revivals (with a bit of a gray area; if the cutoff date is 50 days and it was revived 51 days later who the hell cares), taking into account the relevance of the post that revived it, whether or not it is a popular topic of discussion, and the section's activeness?
plz thx. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Daun Dachette

Joined: 31 Dec 2007 Posts: 129 Location: Yulia City
|
Posted: Sat Jan 12, 2008 2:08 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I agree with that entirely. You seem to be quite the knowledge builder... _________________
For All Those who oppose me stay where you are! ~ Scarecrow Gravitation ~ Be glad I wasted my time on trash like you.
-my Mystic Arte #1, Scarecrow Gravitation.
Watch it slither, watch it leap, watch as you die! ~ Snake Mirror ~ This reflection of death carves time.
-Mystic Arte #2, Snake Mirror. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Lunatic Drache

Joined: 15 Dec 2006 Posts: 4511 Location: With my EDWARDIAN SPARKLING VAMPIRE
|
Posted: Sat Jan 12, 2008 2:09 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Usually when a n00b revives something, it's due to something rather pointless.
If they create a topic, it's usually equally pointless >_>
Or so I gather, anyway.
And some of them are repeat offenders...
Though I don't disagree with the suggestion itself. It'd be nice to have. _________________
Sig by Valor |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Daun Dachette

Joined: 31 Dec 2007 Posts: 129 Location: Yulia City
|
Posted: Sat Jan 12, 2008 2:24 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Well, that is basically what a noob is, is someone with no meaning or helping of the forum...Sort of like a cockroach, you don't need them, but they're there anyway. _________________
For All Those who oppose me stay where you are! ~ Scarecrow Gravitation ~ Be glad I wasted my time on trash like you.
-my Mystic Arte #1, Scarecrow Gravitation.
Watch it slither, watch it leap, watch as you die! ~ Snake Mirror ~ This reflection of death carves time.
-Mystic Arte #2, Snake Mirror. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Moontoon

Joined: 17 Aug 2006 Posts: 9437 Location: Sweden
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Shadowfox Moderator

Joined: 29 Jul 2004 Posts: 21720 Location: Make mine Mayday! 'nuff said...
|
Posted: Sat Jan 12, 2008 8:06 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Daun Dachette wrote: | | Well, that is basically what a noob is, is someone with no meaning or helping of the forum...Sort of like a cockroach, you don't need them, but they're there anyway. |
Yet roaches will survive long after we all nuke ourselves to hell and back...think about that.
But seriously I personally think it depends on a few things:
-When was the topic revived
-Was the post of any relevance to the topic in general
-What the section is that the revival took place
Obviously a five or so month revival is out of the question for practically every section but at the same time if it's only a week or so old (I've seen people get angry at reviving a two-week old topic *yes you read that right*) it's not so much a problem especially if it's still on the first page.
Sections like Legendia don't really have that much traffic so I usually let it slide unless as pointed out earlier the topic is actually ancient. That said the revival better be of importance and not just something "stupid" in the eyes of not only me but many others. _________________ *Sig by WarriorAngel01*

Rise, <3's P4 wife
Alkaid and Shino are <3 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
ladynadiad

Joined: 29 Dec 2006 Posts: 16559 Location: Trying to get certain characters to cooperate for more than a few seconds.
|
Posted: Mon Jan 14, 2008 2:44 am Post subject: |
|
|
And wouldn't this behavior Sludgey is mentioning also be against the rules?
I recall there being something about backseat modding, and saying its fine to be helpful and point things out to a newbie, but that shouldn't be the whole reason why you are posting.
So I would hope the people consistently doing this are earning points and eventually get warned about it so it stops. _________________
ToA Fanfics
|Asch FC|Jade/Tear FC|Writer's Guild |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
summoner_sheena
Joined: 16 Apr 2005 Posts: 9999 Location: Back to wherever Morgan hired me to be
|
Posted: Mon Jan 14, 2008 3:24 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Code: | | OFF-TOPIC BACKSEAT MODDING IS BAD 1 pt |
Yep. And on a related note and find:
| Shinryu in The New Forum Rules thread wrote: | | Bumping an old topic is preferable to creating a new topic on the same subject. |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Odin M Yggdrasil
Joined: 24 Dec 2005 Posts: 14734 Location: Dead
|
Posted: Mon Jan 14, 2008 5:31 am Post subject: |
|
|
The understanding I had of this is if the topic receives no posts for a period of one month, it is considered dead if it has fallen off of the first page in that interval. However, if it is still on the first page revival is fine as long as the subject is one that can be resumed.
Role plays seem to be the exception to this. It seems like many times a RP will go dead for several weeks or even months at a time and then suddenly be resurrected for a while, usually they eventually fall silent too. I am personally in at least three RPs of this nature, where it takes so long for people to answer that by time alone it should be dead, but because people are still around and just stretched for time or ideas it is continued when practical and nobody says anything about it. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Shadowfox Moderator

Joined: 29 Jul 2004 Posts: 21720 Location: Make mine Mayday! 'nuff said...
|
Posted: Mon Jan 14, 2008 6:41 am Post subject: |
|
|
| ladynadiad wrote: | | So I would hope the people consistently doing this are earning points and eventually get warned about it so it stops. |
Yeah as Sludgey pointed out, we do hand out points for any of the back-seat moding.
| Renegade of Life wrote: | | Role plays seem to be the exception to this. It seems like many times a RP will go dead for several weeks or even months at a time and then suddenly be resurrected for a while, usually they eventually fall silent too. I am personally in at least three RPs of this nature, where it takes so long for people to answer that by time alone it should be dead, but because people are still around and just stretched for time or ideas it is continued when practical and nobody says anything about it. |
Yeah, Role-Plays are a bit of an exception because unless everyone involves decides it's time to close up shop for good it's fine for the RP to stay "dead" for a while then be revived, more so if the Role-Players still want to continue and have no intentions of ending it pre-maturely. _________________ *Sig by WarriorAngel01*

Rise, <3's P4 wife
Alkaid and Shino are <3 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
ladynadiad

Joined: 29 Dec 2006 Posts: 16559 Location: Trying to get certain characters to cooperate for more than a few seconds.
|
Posted: Mon Jan 14, 2008 8:27 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Sludgey wrote: | | Code: | | OFF-TOPIC BACKSEAT MODDING IS BAD 1 pt |
Yep. And on a related note and find:
| Shinryu in The New Forum Rules thread wrote: | | Bumping an old topic is preferable to creating a new topic on the same subject. |
|
Which just makes things all the more confusing, because there is also a rule against bumping old topics.
Though I imagine its bumping them for no good reason (which is often the case, sadly).
But at the same time, responding to a post and making a mention of "hey, your avatar is too big" or something at the end isn't (which is often seen in newbie topics).
No wonder newbies get so confused. Maybe that's what we need, better clarifications of the rules. _________________
ToA Fanfics
|Asch FC|Jade/Tear FC|Writer's Guild |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Jaded One

Joined: 29 Mar 2007 Posts: 772 Location: Being busy with Mana Khemia.
|
Posted: Mon Jan 14, 2008 2:54 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Quote: | | Bumping an old topic is preferable to creating a new topic on the same subject. |
The question is, when is it preferable and when is it not? There are rules against say, reviving topics with obvious spammy posts but I've seen some people being yelled at when they bump up a topic with a valid post.
Personally, I see no problem with a topic being revived as long as it still has a purpose. That's just me though. _________________
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Sludgey

Joined: 20 Jan 2008 Posts: 4269
|
Posted: Wed Jan 23, 2008 10:38 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Can we please decide on a cut off date, and maybe see some actual punishment for people who spend a page ranting about how they broke a rule?
Because the back seat modding is still being done.
I mean, I understand that a lot of the people who backseat mod (usually the same person) are scolding the people who do it repeatably. And of course, reviving a 6 month old topic is bad. But, say, a three month topic isn't a big deal at all >_> As it's never in the rules we don't really know how long is too long, but it IS stated in the rules that you shouldn't backseat mod, and since that is a direct violation the person who backseat mods should get the points just as much as the person who revived the topic.
Same goes for people who say "In before lock". They aren't contributing anything, are promoting the topic to be derailed, and are more or less saying "I'm increasing my post count!"
But I digress. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Ryuuko Moderator

Joined: 01 Feb 2005 Posts: 25561 Location: Buffalo
|
Posted: Thu Jan 24, 2008 1:39 am Post subject: |
|
|
For me, it depends. If the topic was revived and something relevant, and on-topic, and more than a small phrase was posted, then I'd let it go. For some cases, I think we'd rather have the topic revived, than a whole new one created. Now the one thing that I do lock when revived, is when a person asks for help, they get help, and then a few months later, someone posts the exact same answer. I uh... think they figured it out over the few month span.
Anyway, I agree with you that the off-topic posts that just state DON'T REVIVE OLD THREADS are spam/backseat modding. I'll take it to the other mods, and we'll try to decide on something. ^^; _________________
+tumblr+ +Sig by xfox+
TALES STUFF FOR SALE: ToV Soundtrack, ToD2 PSP, and others. PM ME FOR DETAILS |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Sludgey

Joined: 20 Jan 2008 Posts: 4269
|
Posted: Thu Jan 24, 2008 2:18 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Well, of course the content of the post should be taken into consideration, but even then a post solely of "reviving topics is bad" is spam and back seat modding. The topic still has the potential of going somewhere 99% of the time and even if it doesn't they should just alert a mod and have them take care of it. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|