Fire Emblem: Awakening (3DS)
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3 ... 57, 58, 59 ... 93, 94, 95  Next
 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Tales Series Forum Index -> Video Gaming
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
Accelerator



Joined: 04 Jul 2007
Posts: 7013

PostPosted: Thu Feb 28, 2013 12:04 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Because your definition of whoring is incredibly unreasonable and doesn't really make sense in the context of the game. Awakening has 49 chapters with all the paralogues.

Then there are 120 spotpass challenges where you fight old fire emblem characters and their teams, and they can be recruited. Again, for free. So you basically have 169 unique chapters of gameplay given to the player for free.


here is the paid dlc list in comparison: http://serenesforest.net/fe13/dlc_jp.html#list

That's not whoring by any reasonable person's definition. Nintendo isn't tricking you into "buying into" anything, nor is there anything to "fall for". It's just...a couple of fun extra events added into the game if you feel like paying for them, which is completely different from "whoring."
_________________
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message MSN Messenger
Arrei



Joined: 23 Jan 2010
Posts: 553

PostPosted: Thu Feb 28, 2013 1:26 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

It's a sad day when the DLC practices of businesses like Activision and Capcom have tainted the name of DLC to this degree. Nintendo's model of DLC is basically what we hoped DLC would initially be (though a bit too expensive in this game's case, personally) back in its infancy... and we can't trust even that.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Sunny



Joined: 23 Aug 2005
Posts: 9756

PostPosted: Thu Feb 28, 2013 1:46 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

As much as I hate DLC with a passion, I have to agree with Kenny.

Source: Iwata Ask session with Intelligent Systems.

IS didn't make the entire game and then decide to cut off portions to market as DLC as you can read here:
Yokota wrote:
Yeah. The additional content idea came up toward the end of development, and just putting in a mechanism for downloading and running additional content made us uneasy with regard to the schedule, so instead of being all for it, we weren't sure what to do and consulted IS.


Also, they were aware of the controversies of DLC:
Maeda wrote:
Well, there would be concern that some might wonder if the game content was a little thin without buying the additional content, so a big assumption was that we had to make the main game solid.
Iwata wrote:
At the same time as making it compatible with additional content, the task arose of polishing up the main game so as not to fall under criticism that the game is lacking unless you buy the extra content.

In other words, they didn't skimp out on the main content of the game at all. The way Fire Emblem DLC is handled truly follows what DLC should have been in the first place: an extension of gameplay to an already finished product. If there was no DLC to begin with, I would not love the game any less.

Also, keep in mind that additional content came up because they wanted to maximize the potential of Awakening's battle system (in regards to class changing). They really thought to themselves "Man...even though we finished this game we still want to do more with it!" but doing so would have delayed the game even further.

True, buying all the DLC would amount to perhaps another full game but I think it's fair enough considering that there's free DLC (The Bonus Box with new cameo characters every day) and purchasable DLC. Could they have released it for free? I don't know. I think of Fire Emblem's DLC has them being paid overtime, which is pretty accurate considering they already finished the game by the time they started working on additional content. On the other hand, Namco and Capcom set aside portions or content of the main game. That's pre-meditated scumbag DLC- a huge difference to what Intelligence Systems/Nintendo did.
_________________
Support XSEED | Listen to Falcom music | Do life the right way

This world is cruel. And also very beautiful.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
Flamfas



Joined: 15 Aug 2007
Posts: 10108
Location: slaying the backlog

PostPosted: Thu Feb 28, 2013 5:03 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Oh, I definitely agree that it's better off than DLC is in other games; it doesn't feel like content that should have been there in the first place, and some of it is free.

However, I just feel like they could have toned down the DLC, a lot. It was great to see a lot of returning heroes, yeah ... but what are they going to do next Fire Emblem? Have all those characters return via DLC again? I would have preferred they had just a few DLC characters and saved others for next time. It also irritates me that the Iote's Shield skill is behind a paywall, but that's nitpicking and not really my main point.

I said "whoring" because I think they added way more DLC than they needed to. Let's be real, almost no one is going to buy ALL the DLC. I think 4-5 maps would have been a better idea; one could "complete" the DLC collection for much cheaper, and it would save a lot of the FE roster for later DLC endeavors in future games.

I will again reiterate that what they do have is still better than what a lot of companies do, but I still felt like it was too much.
_________________
Gaming in 2013:
18 Games Beaten
9 Games Added to Library
Last Update: [beat] THE DENPA MEN They Came By Wave

71 Unbeaten Games
Target: 75 Unbeaten Games
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message MSN Messenger
Conn



Joined: 13 May 2005
Posts: 19375
Location: Snowy climes of Canada

PostPosted: Thu Feb 28, 2013 5:10 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

So wait, your complaint is that they offered too much good content, and because of that there won't be a place for DLC in future?
_________________
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Flamfas



Joined: 15 Aug 2007
Posts: 10108
Location: slaying the backlog

PostPosted: Thu Feb 28, 2013 5:12 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Yes.

Be it good content or not, there's a lot of it; there's no denying that. I would have preferred they saved some of the characters for later rather than us going "oh, they put up an Ephraim map AGAIN" in all future titles.

On top of that, it's quite a bummer to see all the good DLC without a reasonable way to afford it. I'd love to buy all the DLC (I love the game a lot), but there's just simply too much of it.
_________________
Gaming in 2013:
18 Games Beaten
9 Games Added to Library
Last Update: [beat] THE DENPA MEN They Came By Wave

71 Unbeaten Games
Target: 75 Unbeaten Games
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message MSN Messenger
Accelerator



Joined: 04 Jul 2007
Posts: 7013

PostPosted: Thu Feb 28, 2013 5:19 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

I disagree completely with Flamfas. The DLC this game offers is wonderful, and honestly, I will be buying most if not all of it. Admittedly the beach/swimsuit DLC is a little weird and doesn't quite fit with fire emblem, but the other DLC maps are either fun side stories relevant to the main plotline but not required, battles where you fight against past fire emblem heroes(that reward you with past units!) or play nostalgic maps of Fire Emblem's past.

However, none of these are necessary. Versions of the old characters are already available from spotpass, and you already have 169 "chapters" of unique battles in the game without DLC already.


The entire point of this game was to be a compilation and celebration of the series as said in the Iwata asks, and they did a wonderful job with it. Who's to say the next Fire Emblem necessarily has to be a cameo fest like this one, and when making a game specifically to celebrate the series, why only go half way?


Looks like you're just hating on it for being "paid DLC" in a game so chock full of content already. This isn't scumbag dlc plans to charge extra money for features that should already be there or removing things from the main game. The DLC in this game exists to give even more new maps and content to long time fans of the series and tide them over. Clearly they had to work "overtime" to put out this DLC, and that's where your money comes in. There's nothing "whoring" about it. one pack(3 maps)=5 dollars. 4 packs, 12 chapters, 20 dollars=half a fire emblem game. Retail price for the game is 39 dollars. It's priced accordingly and fairly. If you can afford to regularly buy games, you can afford the DLC. It's just up to you if you'd rather spend that money on a new game or if you're having enough fun with FE that you just want more of it.


Also how do you know they won't be able to do fun twists and cameos for DLC in the future? There were plenty of characters left out of this game, and many more maps to use. Who knows what they could think up, or even what the next FE game will be like! It's not like 9 and 10 were like 8, so for all we know this could be a one time thing and you're jumping to huge assumptions.
_________________


Last edited by Accelerator on Thu Feb 28, 2013 5:25 am; edited 1 time in total
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message MSN Messenger
Flamfas



Joined: 15 Aug 2007
Posts: 10108
Location: slaying the backlog

PostPosted: Thu Feb 28, 2013 5:25 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

I'm glad you enjoy the wealth of content.

Accelerator wrote:
Who's to say the next Fire Emblem necessarily has to be a cameo fest like this one, and when making a game specifically to celebrate the series, why only go half way?


Well, good point. I hope that we don't see a DLC deluge in future games like this one.
_________________
Gaming in 2013:
18 Games Beaten
9 Games Added to Library
Last Update: [beat] THE DENPA MEN They Came By Wave

71 Unbeaten Games
Target: 75 Unbeaten Games
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message MSN Messenger
Accelerator



Joined: 04 Jul 2007
Posts: 7013

PostPosted: Thu Feb 28, 2013 5:26 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

I'm glad you're glad I enjoy it, but I can't say I feel the same about you wanting to neuter a fantastic game
_________________


Last edited by Accelerator on Thu Feb 28, 2013 5:26 am; edited 1 time in total
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message MSN Messenger
Conn



Joined: 13 May 2005
Posts: 19375
Location: Snowy climes of Canada

PostPosted: Thu Feb 28, 2013 5:26 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Flamfas wrote:
Be it good content or not, there's a lot of it; there's no denying that. I would have preferred they saved some of the characters for later rather than us going "oh, they put up an Ephraim map AGAIN" in all future titles.

I would rather DLC stay as bonus content instead of being an expected extension that's required to be a unique experience.
_________________
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Flamfas



Joined: 15 Aug 2007
Posts: 10108
Location: slaying the backlog

PostPosted: Thu Feb 28, 2013 5:28 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

I agree with you, Conn ... I think? Not really sure how what you said related to my quote.

Accelerator wrote:
but I can't say I feel the same about you wanting to neuter a fantastic game


I think you're being a bit dramatic. You yourself said the game was fantastic even without all the DLC.
_________________
Gaming in 2013:
18 Games Beaten
9 Games Added to Library
Last Update: [beat] THE DENPA MEN They Came By Wave

71 Unbeaten Games
Target: 75 Unbeaten Games
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message MSN Messenger
Accelerator



Joined: 04 Jul 2007
Posts: 7013

PostPosted: Thu Feb 28, 2013 5:33 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

But clearly your complaints extend past the DLC, given you just complained about all the cameos, throwbacks and references the game has. And that is a huge part of what gives the game it's identity; it's a huge celebration of the series, and it even feels as such(it returns to Marth's world, ffs.) You know you can get almost every past character for free via spotpass, right? It just takes waiting.


And honestly, the game is fantastic without the DLC but the DLC makes it even better. Stuff like joining Ike's army to fight against Roy or seeing the events of the childrens' timeline is just awesome.
_________________
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message MSN Messenger
Flamfas



Joined: 15 Aug 2007
Posts: 10108
Location: slaying the backlog

PostPosted: Thu Feb 28, 2013 5:37 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Accelerator wrote:
But clearly your complaints extend past the DLC, given you just complained about all the cameos, throwbacks and references the game has.


?

No. My sole problem with the game is the amount of paid DLC. (well, and I would like map savepoints, but with smaller maps it's not a huge deal)

What I have a problem with is the idea that we'll have an Ephraim map for purchase in every single title from now on. Granted, the extent of the DLC in future titles may be greatly scaled back due to this game being a celebration of sorts, and this possibly won't ever be an issue.

If they want to put all characters in spotpass in future titles, I don't care. What I would potentially have a problem with is them trying to sell us the same character maps over and over.
_________________
Gaming in 2013:
18 Games Beaten
9 Games Added to Library
Last Update: [beat] THE DENPA MEN They Came By Wave

71 Unbeaten Games
Target: 75 Unbeaten Games
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message MSN Messenger
Shy Link



Joined: 01 Jan 2009
Posts: 459

PostPosted: Thu Feb 28, 2013 5:42 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

I would kind of hate it if the cameo characters and "otherworldly visitors" thing became a regular thing and not just one of Awakening's gimmicks. Not that I'm not enjoying it for what it is; it's just not something that needs to exist outside of the mash-up of series features and ideas that Awakening already is.

So, if this does end up being the only Fire Emblem with DLC cameos, it only makes sense to throw in as many as they can.

I can imagine story relevant DLC might make a come back, but the idea of them throwing in more cameos in the next Fire Emblem is just gleh. Let's not turn this into Tales with its now obligatory cameo costume situation.
_________________
Yasuraka ni...


Last edited by Shy Link on Thu Feb 28, 2013 5:46 am; edited 2 times in total
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail MSN Messenger
Flamfas



Joined: 15 Aug 2007
Posts: 10108
Location: slaying the backlog

PostPosted: Thu Feb 28, 2013 5:44 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

That's pretty much how I feel, Ky.

I originally wasn't aware the title was a celebration of sorts, so I thought the amount of DLC was a sign of things to come. If the extent of DLC is dramatically toned down in future titles, I'd be much happier.
_________________
Gaming in 2013:
18 Games Beaten
9 Games Added to Library
Last Update: [beat] THE DENPA MEN They Came By Wave

71 Unbeaten Games
Target: 75 Unbeaten Games
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message MSN Messenger
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Tales Series Forum Index -> Video Gaming All times are GMT
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3 ... 57, 58, 59 ... 93, 94, 95  Next
Page 58 of 95

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum




Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group